Home
Episode 4 Supports
Episode Description
Exploring: Sasha and Keoni generalize their “short cut” method from Episode 3 by solving x = √(4y) for y.
Students’ Conceptual Challenges
Students often find tasks like the following challenging: “Solve x = √(4y) for y”. In part, that’s because their conception of solving the equation is to produce a numerical value for y.
Focus Questions
For use in a classroom, pause the video and ask these questions:
1. [Pause video at 1:27]. Summarize Sasha and Keoni’s method for solving x = √(4y) for y when x is known.
2. [Pause video at 1:50]. Sasha just said, “What?” What is different about this request to solve for y?
Supporting Dialogue
Ask students to relate this mathematics to other math from school by asking:
Math Extensions
1. Sometimes equations can have more than one variable. Solve the equation below for x. Solve the equation for y. Which is easier?
x2 + 25y2 = 100
2. Are there some values of (x, y) that you can see will or will not satisfy the equation without solving for x or y? What are your strategies?
Mathematics in this Lesson
Lesson Description
Targeted Understanding
CC Math Standards
CC Math Practices
Lesson Description
Sasha and Keoni use the definition of a parabola, the Pythagorean theorem, and their methods from previous lessons to represent the y-value for any point on a particular parabola, given the x-value of that point. In contrast to Lesson 3 in which y-values were given, in this episode x-values will be given.
Targeted Understandings
This lesson can help students:
Common Core Math Standards
• CCSS.M.HSF.IF.C.8: Write a function defined by an expression in different but equivalent forms to reveal and explain different properties of the function.
Keoni and Sasha re-express the equation for a given parabola that they derived in Lesson 3 (namely, x = √(4y)) as y = x2/4. They discuss how the first form of the equation is easier to use when one is given a y-value and needs to determine the corresponding x-value, while the second form is easier to use when one is given an x-value. However, they recognize that the two forms are equivalent and that either can be used to solve both problems.
• CCSS.M.HSG.GPE.A.2. Define appropriate quantities for the purpose of descriptive modeling.
Sasha and Keoni use the geometric definition of a parabola, along with the Pythagorean theorem to derive the equation of a given parabola (namely, y = x2/4).
• CCSS.M.HSN.Q.A.2: Define appropriate quantities for the purpose of descriptive modeling.
As they work to derive the equation of a given parabola using the Pythagorean Theorem, Sasha and Keoni define three quantities that represent the lengths of the sides of a right triangle. Because they are using a general point (x,y) on the parabola (rather than a specific point), these distances are algebraic expressions: y–1, y+1, and x.
Common Core Math Practices
CCSS.Math.Practice.MP8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.
In this lesson, re-expressing the equation for a particular parabola, x = √(4y), as y = x2/4x, is not addressed simply as the application of algebraic manipulation skills. Rather, the process of re-expression illustrates the math practice of looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning. In Episode 3, Sasha and Keoni use the equation x = √(4y) (which they derived in Lesson 3), to find the y-value for a point on the parabola when x = 5. They then repeat their reasoning for x = 10 and x = 437. By paying attention to the algebraic transformations they perform each time to isolate and solve for the y-value, they notice regularities which help them generalize their approach to solve x = √(4y) for y in Episode 4. Approaching the act of re-expression as the generalization of repeated reasoning carries the benefit of reinforcing the equivalence of different forms of an equation and can help students deal with an abstract situation with more meaning.