Home
Episode 5 Supports
Episode Description
Reflecting: Sasha and Keoni examine yet another equation of a parabola that is not in vertex form, y = x2 – 4x + 5. They start out by seeking a method to re-express the equation in vertex form.
Students’ Conceptual Challenges
Re-expressing this equation in vertex form is challenging. Many students have experiences re-expressing quadratic expressions in factored form. Keoni writes (x – 5)(x + 1). While this is true, it does not support their problem solving goal.
Focus Questions
For use in a classroom, pause the video and ask these questions:
1. [Pause the video at 1:38]. Why did Keoni erase (x – 5)(x + 1)? What’s wrong?
2. [Pause the video at 3:00]. What do think of Sasha’s expression x(x – 4) + 5? Is it correct? Does it help?
Supporting Dialogue
Invite students to reflect on problem solving as a whole class. Elicit multiple answers from the class:
Math Extensions
Mathematics in this Lesson
Lesson Description
Targeted Understanding
CC Math Standards
CC Math Practices
Lesson Description
Given the equation of a parabola in any form, Sasha and Keoni find geometric information (such as the focus, directrix, p-value, and vertex) about the parabola.
Targeted Understandings
This lesson can help students:
Common Core Math Standards
• CCSS.M.HSF.IF.C.8: Write a function defined by an expression in different but equivalent forms to reveal and explain different properties of the function.
In this lesson, Sasha and Keoni re-express quadratic functions like y = 2(x – 3)2 + 1 and y = x2 – 4x + 4 in vertex form [y = (x–h)2/(4p) + k] in order to locate geometric information about the graphs (such as the vertex, p-value, focus and directrix). To rewrite the function y = 2(x – 3)2 + 1 in vertex form, they think of 2 as 1 divided by ½ [see 2:20 – 2:31 in Episode 3] and ½ as 4 multiplied by 1/8 [3:21 – 3:43, Episode 3]. To rewrite the function y = x2 – 4x + 4 in vertex form, Sasha and Keoni figure out that they need to factor, but that not every way of factoring is helpful. For example, factoring out the x from x2 – 4x yields y = x(x – 4) + 4 [1:06 – 1:30, Episode 4], which doesn’t help them. However, factoring the entire trinomial yields y = (x – 2)2, which is very close to being in vertex form [3:14 – 2:52, Episode 4]
Common Core Math Practices
CCSS.Math.Practice.MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
An important aspect of Math Practice 1 is not giving up, even when several attempts have not been fruitful. In Episode 5, Sasha and Keoni face a challenging task of rewriting y = x2 – 4x + 5 in vertex form. They begin with a false start, as Keoni incorrectly factors x2 – 4x + 5 as (x – 5)(x + 1) [1:08 – 1:44, Episode 5]. Instead of getting discouraged, Keoni tells Sasha, “Let’s not give up” [2:19 – 2:26]. And they don’t! Sasha tries factoring out the x [2:53 – 3:07], which doesn’t end up helping. However, when they explain the correspondences between y = x2 – 4x + 5 and the function they worked with in Episode 4 [y = x2 – 4x + 4], they are able to successfully rewrite the given equation as y = (x – 2)2 + 1 [4:25 – 4:46].